9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees utilize.
However, decisions rendered because of the Supreme Court of your United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues from the Constitution and federal law.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed under have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 times. The following information is accessible for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, together with signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed from the boy’s past, they requested if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist certain them that that they had nothing to worry about.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of uk case law summaries contracts, giving a beneficial resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.
The different roles of case law in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.